From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10248 invoked by alias); 20 Feb 2002 18:12:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10096 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2002 18:12:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (128.2.145.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 Feb 2002 18:12:07 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16dbDo-0004k2-00; Wed, 20 Feb 2002 13:12:04 -0500 Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 10:12:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Fernando Nasser Cc: Michael Elizabeth Chastain , ac131313@cygnus.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa:testsuite} Overhaul sizeof.exp Message-ID: <20020220131204.A18210@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Fernando Nasser , Michael Elizabeth Chastain , ac131313@cygnus.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <200202201749.g1KHnlv04009@duracef.shout.net> <3C73E572.ECEEEF5E@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3C73E572.ECEEEF5E@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00555.txt.bz2 On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 01:05:38PM -0500, Fernando Nasser wrote: > I can take a look at the KFAIL stuff this weekend if you want. > > But if the ample majority wants to try again [2] and is willing to > work in establishing polices to try and make that work > this time and is willing to help enforcing those polices I would > agree with that. > > So, I am for [3]->[2']->[0'] > > 2' - [2] with extrict polices to prevent xfails to be forgotten. I agree with Fernando at this point (except that I consider 0' unacceptable). Fernando, I'd really appreciate it if you investigated KFAILs. -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer