Re: [rfa:testsuite} Overhaul sizeof.exp

Fernando Nasser
2002-02-20T18:06:29Z

I can take a look at the KFAIL stuff this weekend if you want.

But if the ample majority wants to try again [2] and is willing to
work in establishing polices to try and make that work
this time and is willing to help enforcing those polices I would
agree with that.

So, I am for [3]->[2']->[0']

2' - [2] with extrict polices to prevent xfails to be forgotten.

0' - [0] but the tests are saved somewhere, so they are added
when the fix goes in.

Fernando

Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote:
>
> It sounds like we understand the alternatives and everyone's got opinions
> about them.
>
> [0] Status quo
> [1] FAIL the test
> [2] XFAIL the test
> [3] KFAIL the test
>
> I'm concerned that for each alternative, someone will find a flaw, and
> therefore we'll stick with [0] and keep rejecting useful tests.
>
> Fernando and Daniel and Andrew, I'd like to hold your feet to the fire:
> Can you please rank these in priority order and indicate how many of the
> high priority ones are acceptable.
>
> Also there may very well be a [4] that I haven't heard of or thought of.
>
> My rank is [2] > [1] > [3] > [0]. [2], [1], and [3] are acceptable to me.
> [0] is not.
>
> Michael C

--
Fernando Nasser
Red Hat Canada Ltd. E-Mail: fnasser@redhat.com
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
Toronto, Ontario M4P 2C9