From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-12900-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 19661 invoked by alias); 20 Feb 2002 00:04:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 19499 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2002 00:04:01 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 Feb 2002 00:04:01 -0000
Received: (from mec@localhost)
	by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g1K03xl32217;
	Tue, 19 Feb 2002 18:03:59 -0600
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 16:04:00 -0000
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
Message-Id: <200202200003.g1K03xl32217@duracef.shout.net>
To: drow@mvista.com
Subject: Re: [RFA/c++testsuite] New test for constructor breakpoints
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00515.txt.bz2

Aieee, I am having an instant allergic reaction to -notransfer.  Nothing
else in the test suite uses it except for some internal multi-line stuff
in gdb_test which I do not trust at all.  So we get to be the first
soldier on the beach.  I don't want to have result variations depending
on what version of "expect" somebody has.

There's got to be a better way of tracking which breakpoints have
been successfully set.  Maybe set_bp_overloaded should record that
information?

Michael C