From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2086 invoked by alias); 19 Feb 2002 19:32:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 1934 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2002 19:32:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO delorie.com) (207.22.48.162) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Feb 2002 19:32:10 -0000 Received: (from eliz@localhost) by delorie.com (8.11.6/8.9.1) id g1JJVtQ26530; Tue, 19 Feb 2002 14:31:55 -0500 Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 11:32:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200202191931.g1JJVtQ26530@delorie.com> From: Eli Zaretskii To: cgf@redhat.com CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20020219171019.GF1233@redhat.com> (message from Christopher Faylor on Tue, 19 Feb 2002 12:10:19 -0500) Subject: Re: [RFC] document cygwin native specific commands Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <4.2.0.58.20020219102752.0248dc18@ics.u-strasbg.fr> <4760-Tue19Feb2002152216+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <20020219171019.GF1233@redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00507.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 12:10:19 -0500 > From: Christopher Faylor > > > >As I said earlier, I'd really prefer that you say "Windows > >applications" or "native Windows debugging", instead of using > >"win32". > > How about MS Windows, just to be clear? Sure, that's good.