From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-12886-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 11625 invoked by alias); 19 Feb 2002 17:10:29 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 11489 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2002 17:10:19 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lacrosse.corp.redhat.com) (66.187.233.200)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Feb 2002 17:10:19 -0000
Received: from cgf.cipe.redhat.com (cgf.cipe.redhat.com [10.0.1.172])
	by lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g1JHAHl26044
	for <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>; Tue, 19 Feb 2002 12:10:17 -0500
Received: (from cgf@localhost)
	by cgf.cipe.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.8.7) id g1JHAJv25679
	for gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com; Tue, 19 Feb 2002 12:10:19 -0500
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 09:10:00 -0000
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] document cygwin native specific commands
Message-ID: <20020219171019.GF1233@redhat.com>
Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
References: <4.2.0.58.20020219102752.0248dc18@ics.u-strasbg.fr> <4760-Tue19Feb2002152216+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4760-Tue19Feb2002152216+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i
X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00501.txt.bz2

On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 03:22:16PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> +@node Cygwin Native
>> +@subsection Features for Debugging @sc{win32} PE executables
>> +@cindex @sc{win32} debugging
>> +@cindex native Cygwin debugging
>> +@cindex Win32-specific commands
>
>As I said earlier, I'd really prefer that you say "Windows
>applications" or "native Windows debugging", instead of using
>"win32".

How about MS Windows, just to be clear?  It's always bugged me
that MS abrogated the name Windows for their own use.

>Otherwise, this can go in, as far as I'm concerned.

Ditto.  As always, thanks very much for doing this, Pierre.

cgf