From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-12863-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 9341 invoked by alias); 18 Feb 2002 18:52:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 9193 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2002 18:52:15 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 18 Feb 2002 18:52:15 -0000
Received: (from mec@localhost)
	by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g1IIqCU24016;
	Mon, 18 Feb 2002 12:52:12 -0600
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 10:52:00 -0000
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
Message-Id: <200202181852.g1IIqCU24016@duracef.shout.net>
To: drow@mvista.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: RFA/testsuite/c++: Overhaul userdef.exp
X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00478.txt.bz2

This patch is approved, subject to (you guessed it) addition of the
year 2002 to the copyright line.

I adore this kind of overhaul, thanks.

I proofread the test script and it is all okay.

I ran this through my test bed and did a before-and-after diff.
All configurations look no worse than before.

Michael C

===

2002-02-16  Daniel Jacobowitz  <drow@mvista.com>

	* gdb.c++/userdef.exp: Test overloaded operators properly.
	Remove xfails.