From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-12827-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 26756 invoked by alias); 16 Feb 2002 02:15:29 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 26672 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2002 02:15:23 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Feb 2002 02:15:23 -0000
Received: (from mec@localhost)
	by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g1G2FL310583;
	Fri, 15 Feb 2002 20:15:21 -0600
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 18:15:00 -0000
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
Message-Id: <200202160215.g1G2FL310583@duracef.shout.net>
To: drow@mvista.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] Select a particular mangling of a demangled symbol in lookup_block_symbol
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00442.txt.bz2

dj>	A::A(int) [not-in-charge]

Can the input parser handle that syntax?  Suppose the user wants to
disassemble the not-in-charge constructor?

That's why I want to stick the information in the name:

  A::A(int)
  A::A$nic(int)

dj> Meanwhile, I'd like to put this patch in because it is a strict
dj> improvement over what we have.

I'll look at this particular patch so that I can offer an opinion.

Michael C