From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11201 invoked by alias); 15 Feb 2002 22:36:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 11139 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2002 22:36:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (128.2.145.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 15 Feb 2002 22:36:26 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16bqxu-0002ME-00; Fri, 15 Feb 2002 17:36:26 -0500 Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 14:36:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: scott snyder Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: PATCH to avoid infinite loop in cplus-dem.c on some EDG names Message-ID: <20020215173626.A8937@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: scott snyder , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <200202152231.QAA69091@d0sgibnl1.fnal.gov> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200202152231.QAA69091@d0sgibnl1.fnal.gov> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00436.txt.bz2 On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 04:31:41PM -0600, scott snyder wrote: > > hi - > > The following name, emitted by an EDG-based compiler (kcc 4.0), > causes the demangler to go into an infinite loop when run with > auto demangling. (Try running test-filter with `--format=auto'.) Thanks for the patch - but demangler patches need to go to gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org. The demangler is maintained outside of GDB. Are you testing C++ support on this compiler? I'd be quite surprised if it worked - though not unpleasantly. -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer