Re: [RFA] win32-nat printf and sprintf removal

[Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>]

On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 12:17:17PM +0100, Pierre Muller wrote:
> >@@ -1763,9 +1763,9 @@ cygwin_pid_to_str (ptid_t ptid)
>> >    int pid = PIDGET (ptid);
>> >  
>> >    if ((DWORD) pid == current_event.dwProcessId)
>> >-    sprintf (buf, "process %d", pid);
>> >+    xaprintf (buf, "process %d", pid);
>> >    else
>> >-    sprintf (buf, "thread %ld.0x%x", current_event.dwProcessId, pid);
>> >+    xasprintf (buf, "thread %ld.0x%x", current_event.dwProcessId, pid);
>> >    return buf;
>
>As this is a static buffer, xasprintf can't be used here....
>Andrew, why are the target_pid_to_str functions supposed to return static buffers?
>Isn't that a big waste of memory?

No.

>> >@@ -2009,7 +2009,7 @@ _initialize_check_for_gdb_ini (void)
>> >       {
>> >         int len = strlen (oldini);
>> >         char *newini = alloca (len + 1);
>> >-        sprintf (newini, "%.*s.gdbinit", 
>> >+        xasprintf (newini, "%.*s.gdbinit", 
>> >           (int) (len - (sizeof ("gdb.ini") - 1)), oldini);
>> >         warning ("obsolete '%s' found. Rename to '%s'.", oldini, newini);
>> >       }
>
>  I corrected this one to this patch,
>which doesn't give any warning.
>But the memory allocated for oldini is still lost....
>Can I check this in?

No.  Please don't mess with the sprintfs in win32-nat.c.

cgf