From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-12763-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 15480 invoked by alias); 14 Feb 2002 00:05:19 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 15357 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2002 00:05:17 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (128.2.145.6)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 Feb 2002 00:05:17 -0000
Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 16b9Oi-0006fJ-00; Wed, 13 Feb 2002 19:05:12 -0500
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 16:05:00 -0000
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: Jim Blandy <jimb@zwingli.cygnus.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: RFA: test printing prototyped function types
Message-ID: <20020213190512.A25521@nevyn.them.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Jim Blandy <jimb@zwingli.cygnus.com>,
	gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
References: <20020210201852.3A28E5E9DE@zwingli.cygnus.com> <20020210162659.A2347@nevyn.them.org> <npeljpovx8.fsf@zwingli.cygnus.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <npeljpovx8.fsf@zwingli.cygnus.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i
X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00378.txt.bz2

On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 05:32:03PM -0500, Jim Blandy wrote:
> 
> Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> writes:
> > On Sun, Feb 10, 2002 at 03:18:52PM -0500, Jim Blandy wrote:
> > > +         -re "type = $plain\[\r\n\]+$gdb_prompt $" {
> > > +             if {$gcc_compiled} { setup_xfail_format "stabs" }
> > > +             fail "ptype $id (compiler doesn't emit prototyped types)"
> > > +         }
> > 
> > XFAIL here, according to the comment in the test file...
> 
> Sorry, don't understand what you mean.  The `setup_xfail_format' is
> supposed to make that `fail' behave like an `xfail' when we're reading
> GCC's stabs.

You're quite right, I missed the setup_xfail_format.  Sorry.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz                           Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer