From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2101 invoked by alias); 13 Feb 2002 20:10:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2024 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2002 20:10:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (128.2.145.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 13 Feb 2002 20:10:04 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16b5jA-0002q5-00 for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2002 15:10:04 -0500 Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 12:10:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] gdbserver 1/3 - top level config Message-ID: <20020213151004.A10585@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20020205174549.A13231@nevyn.them.org> <20020206193401.A20153@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020206193401.A20153@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00372.txt.bz2 On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 07:34:01PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 05:45:49PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > This is the first of three interdependent patches to revamp gdbserver. > > This first patch: > > - always builds gdbserver if it is configured > > - configures gdbserver only for Linux/{ARM,ia64,i386,m68k,mips,ppc,sh}. > > > > Those seven targets will hereafter be referred to as "The Seven", > > since I'm really tired of typing that list over and over :) > > > > This disables all the non-Linux targets, which I'm reasonably certain > > do not work. At least the NetBSD targets should be very easily > > reconstitutable. It also disables s390 and x86-64. That's just > > because I didn't have the necessary information handy for either, or a > > way to test either. I'll try to get those two fixed soon, as well as > > Sparc/Sparc64 which did not work at all. > > > > Actually, reading over this list, I believe that SH support is actually > > being contributed by this patch. I did it six or eight months ago, but > > in this new framework, so it couldn't be contributed before this. > > > > This patch contains only changes to top-level configury. OK to commit? > > . These patches are a week old now and have received not a single comment. I'd like to commit them - or to take over maintenance of gdbserver and commit them - both of which I've discussed before. I have some additional work for signal handling and x86 FP support, and then some in-progress work on threads, that are all quite awkward to progress on right now. -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer