Re: [RFA] Sorting symbols. Again.

[Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>]

On Sun, Feb 10, 2002 at 10:17:31PM -0500, Elena Zannoni wrote:
>  > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 12:54:30AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>  > >> I think I got it right this time...  After a tremendous epic of linked 
>  > >> list
>  > >> management bugs, this kills the two dubious uses of 
>  > >> BLOCK_SHOULD_SORT() and
>  > >> replaces them with code to sort lists after finishing with the 
>  > >> search.  It's
>  > >> not the prettiest set of sorts I've ever written - especially the 
>  > >> Insight
>  > >> part - but it works and is reasonably fast.  The lists are generally 
>  > >> small,
>  > >> too.
>  > >>
>  > >> Elena, you implicitly approved this back in November, but I'd 
>  > >> appreciate you
>  > >> looking over it again.  Keith (or someone else on the insight list, of
>  > >> course), I'd appreciate it if you'd double-check my Tcl.  I loathe 
>  > >> Tcl, did
>  > >> I mention?  I'm reasonably sure I got the refcounting right now.
>  > >
>  > > OK, let's be less dirty to TCL.  Having reached the decision that the
>  > > output of gdb_listfuncs does not, in fact, need to be sorted, the patch
>  > > is somewhat simpler.
>  > >
>  > > This version OK?
> 
> 
> [I lost some mail, sorry for the random reply]
> 
> Ok with me for the symtab part.

Thanks, committed.
-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz                           Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer