From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-12622-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 7447 invoked by alias); 8 Feb 2002 17:14:56 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 7383 invoked from network); 8 Feb 2002 17:14:49 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com) (193.131.176.3)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Feb 2002 17:14:49 -0000
Received: by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com; id RAA09904; Fri, 8 Feb 2002 17:14:47 GMT
Received: from unknown(172.16.1.2) by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com via smap (V5.5)
	id xma009159; Fri, 8 Feb 02 17:13:56 GMT
Received: from cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA26119;
	Fri, 8 Feb 2002 17:13:54 GMT
Received: from sun18.cambridge.arm.com (sun18.cambridge.arm.com [172.16.2.18])
	by cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA08910;
	Fri, 8 Feb 2002 17:13:54 GMT
Message-Id: <200202081713.RAA08910@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Corinna Vinschen <vinschen@redhat.com>,
        Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com
Reply-To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com
Organization: ARM Ltd.
X-Telephone: +44 1223 400569 (direct+voicemail), +44 1223 400400 (switchbd)
X-Fax: +44 1223 400410
X-Address: ARM Ltd., 110 Fulbourn Road, Cherry Hinton, Cambridge CB1 9NJ.
X-Url: http://www.arm.com/
Subject: Re: ARM float changes 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 08 Feb 2002 11:41:32 EST."
             <20020208114132.A17495@nevyn.them.org> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2002 09:14:00 -0000
From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00237.txt.bz2


> 
> For instance, my results on i386-linux, callfuncs.exp:
> 	  standard coercion			default coercion
> 	  =================			================
> 
> GCC 2.95
>   stabs+	1 XPASS, 1 FAIL, 1 XFAIL	1 FAIL, 2 XPASS
>   dwarf2	1 FAIL				5 FAIL
> 
> GCC 3.0.4pre
>   stabs+	1 XPASS, 1 XFAIL		2 XPASS
>   dwarf2	0 FAILS				4 FAIL
> 

So doesn't all this mean that the coercion model should be selected based 
on the debug-info type?  Can we do that dynamically in the back-end?

R.