From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32486 invoked by alias); 7 Feb 2002 00:34:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 32374 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2002 00:34:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (128.2.145.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 Feb 2002 00:34:00 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16YcVl-0005FX-00 for ; Wed, 06 Feb 2002 19:34:01 -0500 Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2002 16:34:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] gdbserver 1/3 - top level config Message-ID: <20020206193401.A20153@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20020205174549.A13231@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020205174549.A13231@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00190.txt.bz2 On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 05:45:49PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > This is the first of three interdependent patches to revamp gdbserver. > This first patch: > - always builds gdbserver if it is configured > - configures gdbserver only for Linux/{ARM,ia64,i386,m68k,mips,ppc,sh}. > > Those seven targets will hereafter be referred to as "The Seven", > since I'm really tired of typing that list over and over :) > > This disables all the non-Linux targets, which I'm reasonably certain > do not work. At least the NetBSD targets should be very easily > reconstitutable. It also disables s390 and x86-64. That's just > because I didn't have the necessary information handy for either, or a > way to test either. I'll try to get those two fixed soon, as well as > Sparc/Sparc64 which did not work at all. > > Actually, reading over this list, I believe that SH support is actually > being contributed by this patch. I did it six or eight months ago, but > in this new framework, so it couldn't be contributed before this. > > This patch contains only changes to top-level configury. OK to commit? For the curious, I ran the testsuite over gdbserver on i386-linux. Results: === gdb Summary === # of expected passes 6727 # of unexpected failures 980 # of unexpected successes 101 # of expected failures 102 # of unresolved testcases 11 # of untested testcases 6 # of unsupported tests 6 /opt/src/binutils/x86-as/gdb/testsuite/../../gdb/gdb version 2002-02-03-cvs -nx That's after a patch to fix some timeout problems - checking [isnative] instead of ![is_remote target] - which I'll post in a few days. There's a LOT of timeouts. Including almost all of MI, for reasons not immediately clear. And gcore failed to work over a remote link, presumably because we lack some needed information that the remote protocol can not supply. Ditto info proc. -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer