From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
To: Nick Clifton <nickc@cambridge.redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com
Subject: Re: Confusion over the definition of 'bool' in rdi-share/host.h
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2002 02:57:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200202061055.KAA25668@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "05 Feb 2002 18:12:16 GMT." <m3vgdbdchr.fsf@north-pole.nickc.cambridge.redhat.com>
> Hi Guys,
>
> The ARM port of GDB is currently failing to build for me because of
> this problem:
>
> In file included from /home/nickc/work/sources/egcs/gdb/rdi-share/ardi.h:17,
> from /home/nickc/work/sources/egcs/gdb/remote-rdi.c:46:
> /home/nickc/work/sources/egcs/gdb/rdi-share/host.h:123: conflicting types for `_Bool'
> /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/2.96/include/stdbool.h:41: previous declaration of `_Bool'
>
> It seems that host.h has code that looks like this (trimmed a little):
>
> # define _bool int
>
> #ifdef _bool
> typedef _bool bool;
> #endif
>
> And stdbool.h has:
>
> typedef enum
> {
> false = 0,
> true = 1
> } _Bool;
>
> #define bool _Bool
>
> So the typedef in host.h becomes, effectively "typedef int enum _Bool".
>
> I am not sure if we are allowed to modify rdi-share/host.h, it
> appears to be copyright to ARM, but if we are, then may I submit the
> following patch to undefine bool before it is used ?
>
> Cheers
> Nick
the rdi's host.h is really a non-autoconf approach to generating host
definitions. It's contents should really be replaced with an include of
the standard autoconf generated definitions followed by some cleanups (ie
defining the types that the rdi code need in terms of what autoconf has
provided) to make the rest of the rdi files compile cleanly.
R.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-06 10:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-05 10:11 Nick Clifton
2002-02-05 10:59 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-02-05 11:38 ` Stan Shebs
2002-02-05 19:29 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-02-06 13:02 ` Grant Edwards
2002-02-06 21:36 ` Stan Shebs
2002-02-14 8:09 ` Grant Edwards
2002-02-06 2:57 ` Richard Earnshaw [this message]
2002-02-06 6:13 ` Fernando Nasser
2002-02-06 13:06 ` Grant Edwards
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200202061055.KAA25668@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=rearnsha@arm.com \
--cc=Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=nickc@cambridge.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox