From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4327 invoked by alias); 6 Feb 2002 15:21:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 4203 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2002 15:21:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (128.2.145.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 6 Feb 2002 15:21:48 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16YTtE-0004Ta-00; Wed, 06 Feb 2002 10:21:40 -0500 Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2002 07:21:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Andreas Schwab Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Kill a warning in linux-low.c Message-ID: <20020206102140.A17033@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Andreas Schwab , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20020205171348.A11392@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00169.txt.bz2 On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 01:25:46PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz writes: > > |> Waitpid's second argument is an (int *), not a (union wait *). Committed as > |> obvious. > > Wouldn't it be better to make w an int instead? A little digging around in glibc tells me - yes, you're right. Union wait is a BSD-ism. I'll fix this after the other three gdbserver patches get looked at. -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer