From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25679 invoked by alias); 4 Feb 2002 16:58:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25608 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2002 16:58:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lacrosse.corp.redhat.com) (12.107.208.154) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Feb 2002 16:58:47 -0000 Received: from cgf.cipe.redhat.com (dhcpd104.meridian.redhat.com [172.16.47.104]) by lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g14Gwk308249 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2002 11:58:46 -0500 Received: (from cgf@localhost) by cgf.cipe.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.8.7) id g14Gx7K09053 for gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com; Mon, 4 Feb 2002 11:59:07 -0500 Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2002 08:58:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] Add handling of Ctrl-Break for win32 native target. Message-ID: <20020204165907.GB8850@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <4.2.0.58.20020204155705.01b6f3b8@ics.u-strasbg.fr> <4.2.0.58.20020204161801.01af6210@ics.u-strasbg.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.58.20020204161801.01af6210@ics.u-strasbg.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00080.txt.bz2 On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 04:19:29PM +0100, Pierre Muller wrote: >At 16:08 04/02/2002 , Eli Zaretskii a ?crit: > >>On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Pierre Muller wrote: >> >> > Ctrl-Break exception is not handled by >> > current win32-nat.c code. >> > >> > The following patch fixes this. >> >>IMHO, this should be mentioned in the manual somewhere (as a >>Windows-specific issue). > > I don't undersantd what you mean here: > >should we document this as a known limitation of the win32 native >target up to 5.1.1 or should we specify that Ctrl-Break gets also >caught in newer versions of GDB? I think we should document that Ctrl-Break does the same thing as CTRL-C. Actually, some people seem to think that CTRL-BREAK should send something like a SIGQUIT. That's not the way it works in Cygwin, though, so the new behavior is correct. cgf