From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12390 invoked by alias); 31 Jan 2002 20:00:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12305 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2002 20:00:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dragon.nuxi.com) (66.92.13.169) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 31 Jan 2002 20:00:22 -0000 Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.11.6/8.11.1) id g0VK0Is02106; Thu, 31 Jan 2002 12:00:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 12:00:00 -0000 From: "David O'Brien" To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix BFD's core support on FreeBSD 4.[2-9] Message-ID: <20020131120018.B1818@dragon.nuxi.com> Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.org References: <20020131111656.A1369@dragon.nuxi.com> <3C599A85.3060906@cygnus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3C599A85.3060906@cygnus.com>; from ac131313@cygnus.com on Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 02:27:01PM -0500 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00818.txt.bz2 On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 02:27:01PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > For the life of me I cannot figure out which branch to commit this to > > in case there is a 5.1.2. Should I use the gdb_5_1-2001-07-29-branch or > > gdb_5_1_0_1-2002-01-03-branch ? > > gdb_5_1-2001-07-29-branch I did not regen bfd/configure as the diff from what is in CVS to what autoconf 2.13 (Sourceware's 2.13.000227) produced was *MASSIVE* (but wasn't in mainline when I made this same commit). What is the right version of autoconf to use now? -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)