From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-12360-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 859 invoked by alias); 31 Jan 2002 05:11:18 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 817 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2002 05:11:15 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lacrosse.corp.redhat.com) (12.107.208.154)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 31 Jan 2002 05:11:15 -0000
Received: from cgf.cipe.redhat.com (dhcpd218.meridian.redhat.com [172.16.47.218])
	by lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g0V5BF324762
	for <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>; Thu, 31 Jan 2002 00:11:15 -0500
Received: (from cgf@localhost)
	by cgf.cipe.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.8.7) id g0V5BQY06221
	for gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com; Thu, 31 Jan 2002 00:11:26 -0500
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 21:11:00 -0000
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: linespec.c:cplusplus_hint()?
Message-ID: <20020131051126.GA6203@redhat.com>
Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
References: <3C58C972.9060904@cygnus.com> <20020130235544.B22536@nevyn.them.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20020130235544.B22536@nevyn.them.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i
X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00805.txt.bz2

On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 11:55:44PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 11:34:58PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>> Hello,
>> 
>> I'm wondering if the function:
>> 
>> /* While the C++ support is still in flux, issue a possibly helpful hint on
>>    using the new command completion feature on single quoted demangled C++
>>    symbols.  Remove when loose ends are cleaned up.   FIXME -fnf */
>> 
>> static void
>> cplusplus_hint (char *name)
>> {
>>   while (*name == '\'')
>>     name++;
>>   printf_filtered ("Hint: try '%s<TAB> or '%s<ESC-?>\n", name, name);
>>   printf_filtered ("(Note leading single quote.)\n");
>> }
>> 
>> is still needed.  I'm not worried either way but if it is, I'll change 
>> it and its calls a little.
>
>My vote is to keep it.  Using completion on something inside single
>quotes is not obvious to me.

Ditto.  I think that message is what actually clued me into the fact that I could
do this.

cgf