From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15934 invoked by alias); 29 Jan 2002 03:26:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15803 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2002 03:26:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (128.2.145.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 29 Jan 2002 03:26:31 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16VOun-0005dl-00; Mon, 28 Jan 2002 22:26:33 -0500 Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 19:26:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Cc: Nathanael Nerode Subject: Re: PATCH: autoconfiscate SPU Message-ID: <20020128222633.A21541@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Nathanael Nerode References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00750.txt.bz2 On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 09:50:14PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > This patch autoconfiscates SPU. (Directory src/utils/spu) > It's a pretty basic job, not actually working around any potentially > missing headers, but it works (on i686-linux-gnu, debian woody) > > Because 'configure' is new, cvs diff refused to mention it. It's generated > by autoconf 2.50 from configure.in and will need to be committed along > with the patch. > > Because of this and the total changes to the other two files, the patch > looks far worse than the three files; if anyone wants me to wrap those up > somehow, I will. > > 2002-01-28 Nathanael Nerode > Autoconfiscation of SPU. > * utils/spu/configure: new file for autoconfiscation > * utils/spu/configure.in: replaced for autoconfiscation > * utils/spu/Makefile.in: replaced for autoconfiscation > ! AC_PREREQ([2.50]) No. The entire remainder of the tree uses autoconf 2.13. It is not yet autoconf aware. Moving to autoconf 2.5 is a relatively short-term goal, but for now any configure.in's you add MUST work with 2.13. Working with 2.5 is a plus. -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer