> With that in mind I think either Kevin's or Richard's EXTRA_FRAME_INFO 
> patch (minus any dependencies) should be committed.  The only proviso 
> being that they are before/after tested and show no regressions.

Ok, with that in mind I've committed the following.  It's basically my 
patch plus a couple of bits lifted from Kevin's.

R.


2002-01-21  Richard Earnshaw  <rearnsha@arm.com>
	    Kevin Buettner  <kevinb@redhat.com>

	Convert arm targets to new FRAME interface.
	* arm-tdep.c (struct frame_extra_info): Remove fsr.
	(arm_frame_find_save_regs): Delete.
	(arm_frame_init_saved_regs): New.
	(arm_init_extra_frame_info): Alloacte saved_regs as required.
	Allocate extra_info as required.  Convert all uses of fsr.regs
	to use saved_regs, similarly all uses of EXTRA_FRAME_INFO fields
	to use extra_info.
	(thumb_scan_prologue, arm_scan_prologue, arm_find_callers_reg)
	(arm_frame_chain, arm_frame_saved_pc, arm_pop_frame): Likewise.
	(check_prologue_cache, save_prologue_cache): Likewise.
	(_initialize_arm_tdep): Ensure prologue_cache is correctly set up.
	* config/arm/tm-arm.h (EXTRA_FRAME_INFO): Delete.
	(FRAME_FIND_SAVED_REGS): Delete.
	(arm_frame_find_saved_regs): Delete prototype.
	(arm_frame_init_saved_regs): New prototype.
	(FRAME_INIT_SAVED_REGS): Define.