From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24989 invoked by alias); 20 Jan 2002 19:12:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24950 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2002 19:12:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (128.2.145.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 Jan 2002 19:12:15 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16SNOA-0006W2-00 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 14:12:22 -0500 Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 11:12:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] [1/5] Use DWARF-2 DW_AT_artificial information Message-ID: <20020120141222.A25027@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20020115152720.A28147@nevyn.them.org> <15430.715.800287.164802@localhost.cygnus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <15430.715.800287.164802@localhost.cygnus.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00582.txt.bz2 On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 05:46:35PM -0500, Elena Zannoni wrote: > > OK to commit this one? > > Looks ok to me. This is a fairly self-contained patch. I would think > you can check this in, for start, while I look at the rest of the > series. It should have no visible effect on GDB's behavior, right? Since no one objected, and I think you do have the authority to approve it, I've checked this one in. -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer