From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25684 invoked by alias); 18 Jan 2002 17:28:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25644 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2002 17:28:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dr-evil.shagadelic.org) (208.176.2.162) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 18 Jan 2002 17:28:41 -0000 Received: by dr-evil.shagadelic.org (Postfix, from userid 7518) id DF02D986A; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 09:28:40 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 09:28:00 -0000 From: Jason R Thorpe To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] Support for alpha*-*-netbsd* Message-ID: <20020118092840.E28259@dr-evil.shagadelic.org> Reply-To: thorpej@wasabisystems.com Mail-Followup-To: Jason R Thorpe , Andrew Cagney , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20020117224847.P15405@dr-evil.shagadelic.org> <3C4832FB.9060708@cygnus.com> <20020118081514.A28259@dr-evil.shagadelic.org> <3C48585E.5080506@cygnus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3C48585E.5080506@cygnus.com>; from ac131313@cygnus.com on Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 12:16:14PM -0500 Organization: Wasabi Systems, Inc. X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00512.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 12:16:14PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > For me, the problem is bigger. I'm trying to keep the decision to > accept a new [native] target both simple and transparent. Or to put it > another way, I do not want to put my self in a situtation where I'm open > to suggestions of bias - allowing one person or organization to > contribute a target non-multi-arch when, for a second, I refuse. Ok, I understand that problem... I suppose another way to look at it is "the alpha target already exists, the alpha-bsd configuration of that target already exists, this is merely a new variant of an existing target". :-) Anyway, if I can get the single-step stuff in, then that would allow me to do the multi-arch work pretty easily, I think. -- -- Jason R. Thorpe