From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20581 invoked by alias); 17 Jan 2002 15:41:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 20549 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2002 15:41:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com) (193.131.176.3) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Jan 2002 15:41:46 -0000 Received: by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com; id PAA17302; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 15:41:45 GMT Received: from unknown(172.16.1.2) by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com via smap (V5.5) id xma015512; Thu, 17 Jan 02 15:38:52 GMT Received: from cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA00727; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 15:38:51 GMT Received: from sun18.cambridge.arm.com (sun18.cambridge.arm.com [172.16.2.18]) by cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA20916; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 15:38:50 GMT Message-Id: <200201171538.PAA20916@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Brian Youmans <3diff@gnu.org> cc: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Reply-To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com Organization: ARM Ltd. X-Telephone: +44 1223 400569 (direct+voicemail), +44 1223 400400 (switchbd) X-Fax: +44 1223 400410 X-Address: ARM Ltd., 110 Fulbourn Road, Cherry Hinton, Cambridge CB1 9NJ. X-Url: http://www.arm.com/ Subject: Re: new diff: gdb.texinfo In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 17 Jan 2002 10:21:02 EST." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 07:41:00 -0000 From: Richard Earnshaw X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00482.txt.bz2 > I think I found the list of years in that state. It is important that each > year be listed individually, but we don't otherwise care about the form factor. > Adding spaces after the commas would be fine with me. > > I stuck in the @* because the line wasn't breaking and it was causing an > Overfull /hbox. Indeed, but it will probably be in the wrong place for a different form-factor printing. Putting spaces in between each date would allow TeX to select its own line-breaking points. Since you've no objection, I suggest we do that. R.