From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-11827-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 17972 invoked by alias); 11 Jan 2002 01:53:22 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 17919 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2002 01:53:20 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO tooth.toronto.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 11 Jan 2002 01:53:20 -0000
Received: (from fche@localhost)
	by tooth.toronto.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.0) id g0B1rJT01041;
	Thu, 10 Jan 2002 20:53:19 -0500
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 17:53:00 -0000
From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <cagney@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: ARM simulator maintainer
Message-ID: <20020110205319.F4136@redhat.com>
References: <m3itaaa1qg.fsf_-_@north-pole.nickc.cambridge.redhat.com> <3C3DB0EC.2030807@cygnus.com> <o5666ai2vl.fsf@toenail.toronto.redhat.com> <3C3E3205.9080306@cygnus.com> <20020110202239.E4136@redhat.com> <3C3E4111.5080300@cygnus.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PHCdUe6m4AxPMzOu"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <3C3E4111.5080300@cygnus.com>; from ac131313@cygnus.com on Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 08:34:09PM -0500
X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00272.txt.bz2


--PHCdUe6m4AxPMzOu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-length: 534

Hi -

cagney wrote:
> [...]
> >> As overall sim maintainer/co-ordinator?  Ok, I'll put my self forward.
> > Certainly -- adding yourself to the list would be an "obvious fix".
>=20
> Add or replace.  I'm reading your suggestion as ``... put themselves=20
> forward [as the co-ordinator]''.  I believe others are as well.

I meant simply to restate the long-standing invitation for people to
take interest in not-sufficiently-attended-to pieces of code.  I
wonder what hidden intent you might read into this statement though.


- FChE

--PHCdUe6m4AxPMzOu
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-length: 232

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8PkWPVZbdDOm/ZT0RAjTXAKCD94koPTBt32VcGn5hb4Pk4hmXZgCfcvxO
tumjYO+zGZgu3cIoPv16Huk=
=qzyv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--PHCdUe6m4AxPMzOu--