From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-11788-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 31903 invoked by alias); 10 Jan 2002 16:50:47 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 31872 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2002 16:50:46 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Jan 2002 16:50:46 -0000
Received: (from mec@localhost)
	by duracef.shout.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) id KAA15264;
	Thu, 10 Jan 2002 10:50:45 -0600
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 08:50:00 -0000
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
Message-Id: <200201101650.KAA15264@duracef.shout.net>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, jason@redhat.com
Subject: Re: PATCH to testsuite/gdb.c++/namespace.exp
X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00233.txt.bz2

gdb built from the 5.1 branch prints '\000'.  It looks like one of those
endless cosmetic changes where the testsuite did not keep up with some
change in gdb.

I'm happy with the patch, except that you need to add "2002" to the list
of copyright years in line 1 of gdb.c++/namespace.exp.  Thanks.

Michael C