From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19145 invoked by alias); 9 Jan 2002 17:29:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 19106 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2002 17:29:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com) (193.131.176.3) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Jan 2002 17:29:07 -0000 Received: by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com; id RAA13820; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 17:29:05 GMT Received: from unknown(172.16.1.2) by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com via smap (V5.5) id xma013638; Wed, 9 Jan 02 17:28:57 GMT Received: from cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA14751; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 17:28:56 GMT Received: from sun18.cambridge.arm.com (sun18.cambridge.arm.com [172.16.2.18]) by cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA13540; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 17:28:55 GMT Message-Id: <200201091728.RAA13540@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Andrew Cagney cc: Eli Zaretskii , Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Reply-To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com Organization: ARM Ltd. X-Telephone: +44 1223 400569 (direct+voicemail), +44 1223 400400 (switchbd) X-Fax: +44 1223 400410 X-Address: ARM Ltd., 110 Fulbourn Road, Cherry Hinton, Cambridge CB1 9NJ. X-Url: http://www.arm.com/ Subject: Re: Patch for building gdb on arm-netbsd In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 09 Jan 2002 12:21:11 EST." <3C3C7C07.2090203@cygnus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2002 09:29:00 -0000 From: Richard Earnshaw X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00177.txt.bz2 > I'm puzzled as to why it would be Elena? Anyway, Richard, when > generating new code just keep an eye on > http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/ari/ for things to not copy. > Sure. > BTW, people tend to just use NULL. I would normally, but this was more a case of minimal change given that that function will probably go away entirely soon. > > either way, yes it is obvious, Excellent, except I don't have commit privs to gdb (though I have sources.redhat.com access for some other trees). R.