From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30983 invoked by alias); 5 Jan 2002 01:47:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 30939 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2002 01:47:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (128.2.145.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Jan 2002 01:47:23 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16MfwE-0001HU-00; Fri, 04 Jan 2002 20:47:58 -0500 Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2002 17:47:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Michael Snyder Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] Don't use thread_db on corefiles Message-ID: <20020104204758.A4766@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Michael Snyder , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20011213114847.A17989@nevyn.them.org> <3C35002F.D93E8D94@redhat.com> <20020104132606.D29086@nevyn.them.org> <3C365597.CACFCF4B@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3C365597.CACFCF4B@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00054.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 05:23:35PM -0800, Michael Snyder wrote: > Hmmmm... I don't quite understand why, but your version does seem > to work better. Let's use it for now. Check it in? Done. We can investigate the gory details later. I'm thinking about also moving this to the branch - but I'm going to have a lot of branch patches, so I'll do them all together next week when I can test them all. -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer