From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15155 invoked by alias); 14 Dec 2001 20:50:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 13323 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2001 20:48:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (128.2.145.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 Dec 2001 20:48:54 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16EzGF-0006iR-00; Fri, 14 Dec 2001 15:48:51 -0500 Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 12:50:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Klee Dienes Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC] add 'save-breakpoints' command Message-ID: <20011214154851.A25801@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Klee Dienes , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00385.txt.bz2 On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 03:44:03PM -0500, Klee Dienes wrote: > We've been using a variant of this patch at Apple for a little over a > year; it seems to be working. The test suite shows four additional > unexpected successes when I run it with this patch, but I figure > that's probably OK. That's odd; the testsuite is mostly (entirely?) compiled with debug information. Which are they? -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer