From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12714 invoked by alias); 14 Dec 2001 00:06:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12495 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2001 00:05:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (128.2.145.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 Dec 2001 00:05:00 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16EfqW-0003Wy-00; Thu, 13 Dec 2001 19:05:00 -0500 Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 16:06:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Michael Snyder , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] Don't use thread_db on corefiles Message-ID: <20011213190500.A13544@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Michael Snyder , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20011213114847.A17989@nevyn.them.org> <3C190DDC.B32D6A7B@cygnus.com> <20011213152958.A30211@nevyn.them.org> <3C1931E3.E240B409@cygnus.com> <20011213180259.A11251@nevyn.them.org> <3C1933E7.E2B9DE87@cygnus.com> <20011213181006.A11536@nevyn.them.org> <3C193D13.AED0F79F@cygnus.com> <20011213185635.A12902@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20011213185635.A12902@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00372.txt.bz2 On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 06:56:36PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > Thread_db, as things stand, does not work on core files. Is preventing > it from trying, and thus crashing GDB, really such a disruptive > suggestion? OK, that came out a little harsher than I really wanted it. Sorry. I'd like to apply this patch and then add an entry to TODO about how it "should be done". Is that better? -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer