From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13851 invoked by alias); 8 Dec 2001 00:59:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 13484 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2001 00:57:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lacrosse.corp.redhat.com) (207.175.42.154) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Dec 2001 00:57:54 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (cgf.cipe.redhat.com [10.0.1.172]) by lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id fB80vrh22350 for ; Fri, 7 Dec 2001 19:57:53 -0500 Received: (from cgf@localhost) by redhat.com (8.11.6/8.8.7) id fB80w9S27423 for gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com; Fri, 7 Dec 2001 19:58:09 -0500 Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2001 16:59:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC/RFA] Add hardware watchpoint support for cygwin target. Message-ID: <20011208005809.GB27247@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <8011-Wed28Nov2001201312+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <4.2.0.58.20011128183252.00acd198@ics.u-strasbg.fr> <8011-Wed28Nov2001201312+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <4.2.0.58.20011206092315.016150f0@ics.u-strasbg.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.58.20011206092315.016150f0@ics.u-strasbg.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00226.txt.bz2 On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 09:37:23AM +0100, Pierre Muller wrote: >This is probably an UI_OUT specific problem, but as its again not >cygwin specific I don't think that there is any reason to delay >approval. Have we seen independent corroboration of the bugs that you reported? cgf