From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6162 invoked by alias); 7 Dec 2001 21:59:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 4856 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2001 21:58:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (128.2.145.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 Dec 2001 21:58:37 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16CT1c-0004L4-00 for ; Fri, 07 Dec 2001 16:59:20 -0500 Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2001 13:59:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa/c++testsuite] Add (failing) static member function test to classes.exp Message-ID: <20011207165920.A16322@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20011205144839.A15989@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00215.txt.bz2 On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 04:47:39PM -0500, Jim Blandy wrote: > > Daniel Jacobowitz writes: > > In trying to fix some v3 fails, I found an incredibly bogus line in the > > stabs reader; search for the third occurance of is_stub. "ii" can be the > > name of a function, or the mangling of its parameters. The fix is trivial, > > and will be attached to another one of my v3 patches once the current batch > > are approved (I see no good reason to send two separate patches for the same > > line). > > > > Here's a testcase. OK? > > Thanks, please commit this. Committed. -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer