From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-11075-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 18987 invoked by alias); 5 Dec 2001 19:49:20 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 15794 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2001 19:48:00 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (128.2.145.6)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Dec 2001 19:48:00 -0000
Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 16Bi23-0004DU-00
	for <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>; Wed, 05 Dec 2001 14:48:39 -0500
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2001 11:49:00 -0000
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: [rfa/c++testsuite] Add (failing) static member function test to classes.exp
Message-ID: <20011205144839.A15989@nevyn.them.org>
Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i
X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00142.txt.bz2

In trying to fix some v3 fails, I found an incredibly bogus line in the
stabs reader; search for the third occurance of is_stub.  "ii" can be the
name of a function, or the mangling of its parameters.  The fix is trivial,
and will be attached to another one of my v3 patches once the current batch
are approved (I see no good reason to send two separate patches for the same
line).

Here's a testcase.  OK?

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz                           Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer

2001-12-05  Daniel Jacobowitz  <drow@mvista.com>

	* gdb.c++/classes.exp: Add test for static member function.
	* gdb.c++/misc.cc: Add class with static member function.

Index: classes.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.c++/classes.exp,v
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -r1.8 classes.exp
--- classes.exp	2001/07/03 19:52:46	1.8
+++ classes.exp	2001/12/05 19:38:51
@@ -308,5 +308,21 @@
 	}
     }
 
+    # With g++ 2.x and stabs debug info, we misinterpret static methods
+    # whose name matches their argument mangling.
+    send_gdb "ptype class Static\n"
+    gdb_expect {
+	-re "type = (class|struct) Static \{(${ws}public:|)${ws}Static & operator=\\(Static const ?&\\);${ws}Static\\(Static const ?&\\);${ws}Static\\((void|)\\);${ws}static void ii\\(int, int\\);${ws}\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
+	    pass "ptype class Static"
+	}
+	-re ".*$gdb_prompt $" {
+	    fail "ptype class Static"
+	}
+	timeout {
+	    fail "ptype class Static (timeout)"
+	    return
+	}
+    }
+
     send_gdb "ptype class vA\n"
     gdb_expect {
Index: misc.cc
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.c++/misc.cc,v
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.4 misc.cc
--- misc.cc	2000/07/09 05:16:11	1.4
+++ misc.cc	2001/12/05 19:40:04
@@ -269,6 +269,14 @@
   inheritance2 ();	
 }
 
+// ======================== static member functions =====================
+
+class Static {
+public:
+  static void ii(int, int);
+};
+void Static::ii (int, int) { }
+
 // ======================== virtual base classes=========================
 
 class vA {