From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4654 invoked by alias); 3 Dec 2001 18:12:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 4605 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2001 18:12:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (128.2.145.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 3 Dec 2001 18:12:05 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16AxZy-0005Gp-00; Mon, 03 Dec 2001 13:12:34 -0500 Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2001 10:12:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Cc: ac131313@cygnus.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] Allow casting of object pointers for method calls Message-ID: <20011203131234.A20076@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain , ac131313@cygnus.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <200112031805.MAA10239@duracef.shout.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200112031805.MAA10239@duracef.shout.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00040.txt.bz2 On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 12:05:18PM -0600, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote: > The performance problem is hundreds of timeouts caused by: > > Reading symbols from /berman/fsf/_today_/berman/native/build/gdb/gdb_5_1-2001-07-29-branch/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/funcargs...Dwarf Error: Cannot handle DW_FORM_strp in DWARF reader. > (gdb) ERROR: couldn't load /berman/fsf/_today_/berman/native/build/gdb/gdb_5_1-2001-07-29-branch/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/funcargs into /berman/fsf/_today_/berman/native/build/gdb/gdb_5_1-2001-07-29-branch/gdb/testsuite/../../gdb/gdb. > > I am going to re-pull, re-build, re-test. I'm pretty sure that a patch for this was approved on mainline in November: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2001-11/msg00231.html You're not going to be able to use 5.1-branch with the output of GCC mainline unless this is moved to the branch. The branch is open again, right, Andrew? If so, this would be a good candidate. -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer