From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jim Blandy To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFA: document GDB's overlay support Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 14:53:00 -0000 Message-ID: References: <20011130205837.ED4F15E9D8@zwingli.cygnus.com> <8582-Fri30Nov2001235720+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> X-SW-Source: 2001-11/msg00639.html Message-ID: <20011130145300.r60zXsF5_UuKFOj9Wv72R8xo1MCOWKW4cOpIpQxyo4A@z> "Eli Zaretskii" writes: > > *** gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo 2001/09/12 19:49:52 1.51 > > --- gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo 2001/10/09 16:40:00 > > This patch is approved, with the following minor comments: Great, I'll assume this approval applies (with the comments) to my text-only patch as well. > > + *** makeinfo/makeinfo.c.~1~ Sun Sep 19 10:24:44 1999 > > + --- makeinfo/makeinfo.c Wed Sep 26 10:49:48 2001 > > Did you send this to the Texinfo maintainer? Yes. > If so, is this patch available in Texinfo 4.0d, the latest pretest > on alpha.gnu? I don't know. > In any case, if the only problem is that makeinfo doesn't search the > include directories for images, people could force it to DTRT by > simlpy putting the image files in the current directory, right? > Perhaps it's better to tell them to do this, instead of rebuilding > makeinfo? That would be simpler. I guess I wanted to provide instructions for putting your build system back in a "working normal" state: you type "cvs update", "configure", and "make", and things just work, without needing to remember to copy over certain files. But obviously, the instructions should mention the simpler alternative, for those less forgetful than me.