From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21725 invoked by alias); 29 Nov 2001 01:27:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21687 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2001 01:27:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lacrosse.corp.redhat.com) (207.175.42.154) by hostedprojects.ges.redhat.com with SMTP; 29 Nov 2001 01:27:55 -0000 Received: from trixie.bosbc.com (cgf.cipe.redhat.com [10.0.1.172]) by lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id fAT1Rsq23862 for ; Wed, 28 Nov 2001 20:27:54 -0500 Received: (from cgf@localhost) by trixie.bosbc.com (8.11.6/8.8.7) id fAT1Rq010507 for gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com; Wed, 28 Nov 2001 20:27:52 -0500 Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 23:01:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC/RFA] Add hardware watchpoint support for cygwin target. Message-ID: <20011129012752.GA10485@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <8011-Wed28Nov2001201312+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <4.2.0.58.20011128183252.00acd198@ics.u-strasbg.fr> <8011-Wed28Nov2001201312+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <3.0.6.32.20011128234055.00b33480@ics.u-strasbg.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3.0.6.32.20011128234055.00b33480@ics.u-strasbg.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i X-SW-Source: 2001-11/txt/msg00331.txt.bz2 On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 11:40:55PM +0100, muller@cerbere.u-strasbg.fr wrote: >At 14:30 28/11/01 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >The problem is only that the messages should probably be removed by >disaling output while loading new DLLs. Does this answer your worries? Sorry, no. I am still not clear on what is happening? Are you talking about a regression or not? cgf From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christopher Faylor To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC/RFA] Add hardware watchpoint support for cygwin target. Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 17:27:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20011129012752.GA10485@redhat.com> References: <8011-Wed28Nov2001201312+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <4.2.0.58.20011128183252.00acd198@ics.u-strasbg.fr> <3.0.6.32.20011128234055.00b33480@ics.u-strasbg.fr> X-SW-Source: 2001-11/msg00546.html Message-ID: <20011128172700.gkXATay7WXrPUt8xqbtExI9BiK3z2TrGb6t6gdy3fWw@z> On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 11:40:55PM +0100, muller@cerbere.u-strasbg.fr wrote: >At 14:30 28/11/01 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >The problem is only that the messages should probably be removed by >disaling output while loading new DLLs. Does this answer your worries? Sorry, no. I am still not clear on what is happening? Are you talking about a regression or not? cgf