From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Daniel Berlin <dan@cgsoftware.com>
To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
Cc: <ac131313@cygnus.com>, <jimb@zwingli.cygnus.com>, <drow@mvista.com>, <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>, <kevinb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFA/c++] Fix printing classes with virtual base classes
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 20:49:00 -0000
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0111272348530.7320-100000@www.cgsoftware.com>
References: <200111280438.WAA13847@duracef.shout.net>
X-SW-Source: 2001-11/msg00528.html
Message-ID: <20011127204900.yyRrVPy_XxjD1Vp7RlZaqi8Y3GuefySizRMhoRgaM48@z>

On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote:

> And I would be happy to run tests against v2 and v3 C++ compilers
> and report the results.  Most of my time is only on weekends though.
>
> The trouble with the gdb C++ code is that it's not logic bugs, it's
> perverse data structures where each bug fix may not affect the
> test results much.
Almost.
It's perverse logic combined with shoehorned data structures.

Or was that shoehorned logic combined with perverse data structures.

Hmmm.

> So Jim's judgement is much more useful than
> my mechanical test results.
>
> Michael C
>