From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jim Blandy <jimb@zwingli.cygnus.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
Cc: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Subject: Re: [RFA/c++] Fix printing classes with virtual base classes
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 12:48:00 -0000
Message-ID: <npelmkhrcg.fsf@zwingli.cygnus.com>
References: <20011126201945.A27754@nevyn.them.org> <20011126210231.A32203@nevyn.them.org> <1011127022440.ZM10256@ocotillo.lan> <3C031F89.70001@cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-11/msg00508.html
Message-ID: <20011127124800.QPTt71111gUQvqQOLSa_7gO1Kx7mlIbJIOJXxxUTpgg@z>

Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com> writes:
> > I don't have any comments on Daniel's patch, but I am wondering who
> > will approve this.  Given that we currently have no C++ maintainer,
> > should we treat Daniel's patch as an RFC and have him commit it after
> > a few days if there are no objections?
> 
> I'm pretty sure Jim Blandy, as a (most experienced?) language 
> maintainer, will take care of it.

I'm not really qualified to be a C++ maintainer, but I'd be happy to
lend Daniel a second pair of eyes for checking his patches.