From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-10770-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 24516 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2001 05:17:18 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 24493 invoked from network); 27 Nov 2001 05:17:14 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lacrosse.corp.redhat.com) (207.175.42.154)
  by hostedprojects.ges.redhat.com with SMTP; 27 Nov 2001 05:17:14 -0000
Received: from trixie.bosbc.com (cgf.cipe.redhat.com [10.0.1.172])
	by lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id fAR5HDq06939;
	Tue, 27 Nov 2001 00:17:13 -0500
Received: (from cgf@localhost)
	by trixie.bosbc.com (8.11.6/8.8.7) id fAR5H8417687;
	Tue, 27 Nov 2001 00:17:08 -0500
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 22:27:00 -0000
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] SSE registers for cygxin target.
Message-ID: <20011127051708.GA17675@redhat.com>
Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>,
	gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
References: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1011126143653.12758G-100000@is> <3C02A966.30003@cygnus.com> <20011126222315.GA10876@redhat.com> <3C031AC2.6090009@cygnus.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3C031AC2.6090009@cygnus.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i
X-SW-Source: 2001-11/txt/msg00266.txt.bz2

On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 11:46:58PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>>On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 03:43:18PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>>So, should I hold off accepting this patch, then?  It seems pretty
>>straight-forward except for this issue.
  straightforward
>
>The patch follows established conventions so no point in holding back on it.

Ok.  I've applied this patch.

Thanks, Pierre.

cgf


From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] SSE registers for cygxin target.
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 21:17:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20011127051708.GA17675@redhat.com>
References: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1011126143653.12758G-100000@is> <3C02A966.30003@cygnus.com> <20011126222315.GA10876@redhat.com> <3C031AC2.6090009@cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-11/msg00481.html
Message-ID: <20011126211700.zqjSmi4gBCWqUu1_gXt_5Wg5ZEIUEJlzp6RiQHyp3JE@z>

On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 11:46:58PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>>On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 03:43:18PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>>So, should I hold off accepting this patch, then?  It seems pretty
>>straight-forward except for this issue.
  straightforward
>
>The patch follows established conventions so no point in holding back on it.

Ok.  I've applied this patch.

Thanks, Pierre.

cgf