From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christopher Faylor To: Michael Snyder Cc: Pierre Muller , tromey@redhat.com, Elena Zannoni , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: PATCH: --args => build failure Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 15:05:00 -0000 Message-id: <20011126230453.GA11238@redhat.com> References: <873d3mcpcu.fsf@creche.redhat.com> <3BED93E7.9000104@cygnus.com> <87snbmb9nm.fsf@creche.redhat.com> <15356.10158.489653.156184@krustylu.cygnus.com> <4.2.0.58.20011122121440.01d54488@ics.u-strasbg.fr> <3C02C925.BB760686@cygnus.com> X-SW-Source: 2001-11/msg00462.html On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 02:58:45PM -0800, Michael Snyder wrote: >Pierre Muller wrote: >> >> At 00:13 22/11/2001 , Tom Tromey a ?crit: >> > >>>>> "Elena" == Elena Zannoni writes: >> > >> >Elena> main.c changes are ok. >> > >> >Thanks! I think that's the last approval I need. I'll check the >> >patch in this evening. >> > >> >I assume I should close the corresponding PRs. What is the gdb >> >process for this? Do I simply close them? Put them in `feedback'? >> >Or what? >> >> Your patch does create a build failure for cygwin target. >> >> This target apparently does not use fork-child.c >> (at least it is not included into the libgdb.a) > >I would suspect that any non-native (eg. embedded) gdb >would fail to build for the same reason. FWIW, I moved the function to infcmd.c in my sandbox. cgf From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21189 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2001 23:05:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21136 invoked from network); 26 Nov 2001 23:05:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lacrosse.corp.redhat.com) (207.175.42.154) by hostedprojects.ges.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Nov 2001 23:05:04 -0000 Received: from trixie.bosbc.com (cgf.cipe.redhat.com [10.0.1.172]) by lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id fAQN4xq16118; Mon, 26 Nov 2001 18:04:59 -0500 Received: (from cgf@localhost) by trixie.bosbc.com (8.11.6/8.8.7) id fAQN4re11282; Mon, 26 Nov 2001 18:04:53 -0500 Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 09:00:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: Michael Snyder Cc: Pierre Muller , tromey@redhat.com, Elena Zannoni , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: PATCH: --args => build failure Message-ID: <20011126230453.GA11238@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Michael Snyder , Pierre Muller , tromey@redhat.com, Elena Zannoni , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <873d3mcpcu.fsf@creche.redhat.com> <3BED93E7.9000104@cygnus.com> <87snbmb9nm.fsf@creche.redhat.com> <15356.10158.489653.156184@krustylu.cygnus.com> <4.2.0.58.20011122121440.01d54488@ics.u-strasbg.fr> <3C02C925.BB760686@cygnus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3C02C925.BB760686@cygnus.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i X-SW-Source: 2001-11/txt/msg00247.txt.bz2 Message-ID: <20011113090000.99_E9u7qu-UKhF-baBomouAsTZDoEVs01Ro7M-uvHj0@z> On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 02:58:45PM -0800, Michael Snyder wrote: >Pierre Muller wrote: >> >> At 00:13 22/11/2001 , Tom Tromey a ?crit: >> > >>>>> "Elena" == Elena Zannoni writes: >> > >> >Elena> main.c changes are ok. >> > >> >Thanks! I think that's the last approval I need. I'll check the >> >patch in this evening. >> > >> >I assume I should close the corresponding PRs. What is the gdb >> >process for this? Do I simply close them? Put them in `feedback'? >> >Or what? >> >> Your patch does create a build failure for cygwin target. >> >> This target apparently does not use fork-child.c >> (at least it is not included into the libgdb.a) > >I would suspect that any non-native (eg. embedded) gdb >would fail to build for the same reason. FWIW, I moved the function to infcmd.c in my sandbox. cgf