From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
To: Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] SSE registers for cygxin target.
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 20:47:00 -0000
Message-ID: <3C031AC2.6090009@cygnus.com>
References: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1011126143653.12758G-100000@is> <3C02A966.30003@cygnus.com> <20011126222315.GA10876@redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-11/msg00479.html
Message-ID: <20011126204700.ZD9dF0lnt517shzMz_u93MYasA4elE4zHGMLnDNnQK4@z>

> On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 03:43:18PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
>>>On Mon, 26 Nov 2001, Pierre Muller wrote:
>>>
>>>
> 
>>>>-#undef HAVE_SSE_REGS	/* FIXME! win32-nat.c needs to support XMMi 
>>>>registers */
>>>>+/* Use SSE registers if winnt.h contains information about them.  */
>>>>+#ifdef HAVE_CONTEXT_EXTENDED_REGISTERS
>>>>+#define HAVE_SSE_REGS
>>>>+#else

> So, should I hold off accepting this patch, then?  It seems pretty
> straight-forward except for this issue.

The patch follows established conventions so no point in holding back on it.

enjoy,
Andrew