Re: [RFA] New tests for 'const' and 'volatile' expressions

Fernando Nasser
2001-11-14T21:55:13Z

Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote:
>
> It goes down smoothly with my flock of compilers (gcc 2.95.3, gcc 3.0.2,
> gcc gcc-3_0-branch, gcc HEAD). And when I run it on the 5.1 branch,
> it does its job and gives FAILs. I think it's nifty.
>

Thanks for the tests!

I wonder why there are failures...
Isn't 5.1 after Michael Snyder's September changes?

--
Fernando Nasser
Red Hat - Toronto E-Mail: fnasser@redhat.com
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
Toronto, Ontario M4P 2C9