From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21271 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2001 05:07:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21238 invoked from network); 27 Nov 2001 05:07:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.cygnus.com) (24.114.42.213) by hostedprojects.ges.redhat.com with SMTP; 27 Nov 2001 05:07:22 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.cygnus.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD3B03DBA; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 00:07:21 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3C031F89.70001@cygnus.com> Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 21:56:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.3) Gecko/20011020 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kevin Buettner Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Daniel Jacobowitz Subject: Re: [RFA/c++] Fix printing classes with virtual base classes References: <20011126201945.A27754@nevyn.them.org> <20011126210231.A32203@nevyn.them.org> <1011127022440.ZM10256@ocotillo.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2001-11/txt/msg00265.txt.bz2 Message-ID: <20011113215600.EPMVeorL7_dsj5pF_6dD09OweLJddjMT2RgBs5eJ2Bc@z> > I don't have any comments on Daniel's patch, but I am wondering who > will approve this. Given that we currently have no C++ maintainer, > should we treat Daniel's patch as an RFC and have him commit it after > a few days if there are no objections? I'm pretty sure Jim Blandy, as a (most experienced?) language maintainer, will take care of it. Andrew