From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19090 invoked by alias); 13 Nov 2001 17:18:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 19052 invoked from network); 13 Nov 2001 17:18:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.230.5) by sourceware.cygnus.com with SMTP; 13 Nov 2001 17:18:51 -0000 Received: from loony.cygnus.com (loony.cygnus.com [205.180.230.181]) by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA21659; Tue, 13 Nov 2001 09:18:48 -0800 (PST) Received: (from cgf@localhost) by loony.cygnus.com (8.11.6/8.8.7) id fADHIvj29064; Tue, 13 Nov 2001 12:18:57 -0500 Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2001 13:49:00 -0000 From: Chris Faylor To: Fernando Nasser Cc: Andrew Cagney , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa/dejagnu] Work around cygwin / expect background problem Message-ID: <20011113171857.GD29003@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Fernando Nasser , Andrew Cagney , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <3BF0135D.9000902@cygnus.com> <3BF147E8.CDEF58C3@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3BF147E8.CDEF58C3@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i X-SW-Source: 2001-11/txt/msg00033.txt.bz2 On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 11:18:48AM -0500, Fernando Nasser wrote: >Andrew Cagney wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> The attached patch tweeks dejagnu/lib/remote/exp so that it uses the >> shell's background rather than the TCL background operator when trying >> to kill a GDB that's gone wallkabout. >> >> Turns out that expect on cygwin occasionaly and mysteriously die when >> executing the TCL background. While the cygwin problems now appear >> fixed, the problem is still out there in the field :-( >> >> look ok (fernando I guess?), > >OK with me. But maybe you should say "on older versions of cygwin", or >even on versions of cygwin older than " in this comment: I guess "some older versions of cygwin" would be correct. I don't know exactly when this was fixed. cgf