From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Corinna Vinschen <vinschen@redhat.com>
To: gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFA]: testsuite/gdb.base/miscexprs.*
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 12:20:00 -0000
Message-id: <20011031212016.L32706@cygbert.vinschen.de>
References: <20011031175346.G32706@cygbert.vinschen.de> <3BE05398.C708813C@cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-10/msg00400.html

On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 11:40:08AM -0800, Michael Snyder wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > on my target I have the same problem with the very small (2K) stack
> > when running miscexprs.exp as I already had with call-ar-st.exp.
> > 
> > I would like to propose the following patch, which adds the ability
> > to extend miscexprs.exp for targets, which also suffer from the
> > small stack.  I added a compiler switch to define the preprocessor
> > symbol `STORAGE', which by default is set to empty. A target
> > specific conditional can be used for setting it to "static", to
> > allow running the tests with the datastructures allocated in the
> > global data area instead of on the stack.  Obviously, miscexprs.exp
> > in the below incarantion just contains such a conditional only for
> > the target I'm just working on...
> 
> This is a good step, and I'm in favor of accepting it.
> I'd just like to suggest that an even better approach
> might be to add a dejagnu variable that could be defined
> in the baseboard file, rather than put a target ifdef in
> the testsuite script.
> 
> Something like this:
> baseboard file:
>   set_board_info gdb, small_stack_section, 1
>   set_board_info gdb, small_data_section, 1    // future extension
> testsuite file:
>   if [target_info exists gdb,small_stack_section] {
>      set storage "-DSTORAGE=static"
>   }

Thanks for the suggestion!  I like it so much that I immediately
changed my patch.  The new patch is below.

Corinna

2001-10-31  Corinna Vinschen  <vinschen@redhat.com>

	* gdb.base/miscexprs.c (main): Add usage of preprocessor
	symbol `STORAGE' to allow to choose the storage class of
	the local datastructures.
	* gdb.base/miscexprs.exp: Handle setting a `-DSTORAGE=...'
	compiler directive.


Index: miscexprs.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/miscexprs.c,v
retrieving revision 1.1.1.2
diff -u -p -r1.1.1.2 miscexprs.c
--- miscexprs.c	1999/04/26 18:27:11	1.1.1.2
+++ miscexprs.c	2001/10/31 20:18:04
@@ -7,27 +7,27 @@ marker1 ()
 int
 main ()
 {
-  struct {
+  STORAGE struct {
     char c[100];
   } cbig;
 
-  struct {
+  STORAGE struct {
     int i[800];
   } ibig;
 
-  struct {
+  STORAGE struct {
     long l[900];
   } lbig;
 
-  struct {
+  STORAGE struct {
     float f[200];
   } fbig;
 
-  struct {
+  STORAGE struct {
     double d[300];
   } dbig;
 
-  struct {
+  STORAGE struct {
     short s[400];
   } sbig;
 
Index: miscexprs.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/miscexprs.exp,v
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -p -r1.5 miscexprs.exp
--- miscexprs.exp	2001/03/06 08:21:50	1.5
+++ miscexprs.exp	2001/10/31 20:18:04
@@ -30,6 +30,17 @@ if $tracelevel then {
         strace $tracelevel
         }
 
+# By default, the datastructures are allocated on the stack.  For targets
+# with very small stack, that will not work.  In that case, just set
+# storage to `-DSTORAGE=static' which changes the datastructures to be
+# allocated in data segment.
+set storage "-DSTORAGE="
+if [target_info exists gdb,small_stack_section] {
+    set storage "-DSTORAGE=static"
+}
+
+set additional_flags "additional_flags=-w ${storage}"
+
 #
 # test running programs
 #
@@ -40,7 +51,7 @@ set testfile "miscexprs"
 set srcfile ${testfile}.c
 set binfile ${objdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}
 
-if  { [gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}" "${binfile}" executable {debug additional_flags=-w}] != "" } {
+if  { [gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}" "${binfile}" executable [list debug ${additional_flags}]] != "" } {
     gdb_suppress_entire_file "Testcase compile failed, so all tests in this file will automatically fail."
 }