Re: gdbserver/{,,}.c?; Was: [rfa] gdbserver overhaul

Mark Kettenis
2001-10-21T04:02:00Z

Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com> writes:

> > I used lnx-, because they needed to be 8.3 unique - isn't that
> > preferred to an entry in fnmatch.* (?)? They were originally
> > low-linux-*.c instead, which was much more logical to me. I'll go back
> > to that if the 8.3 conflicts are not a concern.
>
> I think the ``keep it consistent and call it linux'' concern overrides
> the 8.3 concern.

It just occured to me that if we really want to use a consistent
naming scheme, we should probably use CPU-OS-low.c
(i.e. i386-linux-low.c) just like we have CPU-OS-tdep.c and
CPU-OS-nat.c.