From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa] gdbserver overhaul Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 10:57:00 -0000 Message-id: <20011017135735.A10898@nevyn.them.org> References: <20011011161453.A15989@nevyn.them.org> <3BCD045B.4050607@cygnus.com> <20011017002357.A25378@nevyn.them.org> <3BCDAC68.5040500@cygnus.com> X-SW-Source: 2001-10/msg00249.html On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 12:06:00PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > > >I've thought about it. The text file would also need to specify > >registers to be sent in a resume packet, or those could be moved to the > >low* files without too much pain (although they're really per-cpu > >rather than per-target, which is why I put them where they are). > > Do you mean the registers sent target->host with a T packet? The > contents of that list isn't part of the protocol. Indeed, but per-CPU (with the protocol) seemed the logical way to specify it. It's not part of the protocol, but it strikes me as a sort of recommended corollary to it. -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer