From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Salter To: eliz@is.elta.co.il Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: set/show remotestopbits Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 11:23:00 -0000 Message-id: <200109261823.f8QINco28685@deneb.localdomain> References: <200109261227.f8QCRjr27498@deneb.localdomain> <1858-Wed26Sep2001164321+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <200109261502.f8QF23T27912@deneb.localdomain> <1225-Wed26Sep2001200214+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> X-SW-Source: 2001-09/msg00361.html >>>>> Eli Zaretskii writes: >> Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 11:02:03 -0400 >> From: Mark Salter >> >> I'm going to take up Fernando's suggestion for the syntax. I'll look >> at completion then. > Thanks! >> > In any case, please also send something for gdb.texinfo to document >> > the new command. >> >> Most (if not all) of the "set/show remote foo" commands seem to be >> undocumented in the manual. > I've just checked in a quite old snapshot, and found 64 set commands, > half of which was documented in the manual. I wouldn't call that > "most", let alone "all". I wasn't referring to general set/show commands. Just "set/show remote*" and "set/show remote *". I count 26 of those. None documented in the manual that I can find. > In any case, the fact that there's a number of undocumented commands > does not mean we should add to that number. Fair enough. --Mark