From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ac131313@localhost.cygnus.com (Andrew Cagney)
To: Jiri Smid <smid@suse.cz>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: i386 8-byte wide watchpoints
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 09:06:00 -0000
Message-id: <20010921160551.93B1B3E0B@localhost.cygnus.com>
References: <s8v7kutdn72.fsf@naga.suse.cz>
X-SW-Source: 2001-09/msg00288.html

> 
> Index: ChangeLog
> from  Jiri Smid   <smid@suse.cz>
> 
> 	* MAINTAINERS: Add myself to the write-after-approval list.

Jiri, just fyi.  People try to keep un-related changes separate(1).

Additions/changes to the MAINTAINERS file are considered obvious (your
addition is very obvious and most welcome!) so they just go straight
in (another generalization is: commit a change, post a patch(2)).

If you're wondering, I personally keep track of this by having
multiple GDB source trees, one for each change I submit.  Before going
on a hacking frenzy, I'll `tar cf - src | tar xpf -` a clean tree and
then hack away.

enjoy,
	Andrew

(1) People also do things like: pick all the obvious bits of a change
out and then commit them separatly as they don't need approval; or get
approval in principal for not-so-obvious changes and thus make them
obvious :-)

(2) Unless it is a really embarising foobar to the ChangeLog file or
...