From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Andrew Cagney Cc: Kevin Buettner , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa/ppc/branch too] Fix PowerPC/Linux cores Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2001 14:36:00 -0000 Message-id: <20010803143653.A10978@nevyn.them.org> References: <20010730142328.A6323@nevyn.them.org> <1010730224404.ZM5571@ocotillo.lan> <20010730155455.A3552@nevyn.them.org> <1010731004934.ZM5803@ocotillo.lan> <20010802120808.A3911@nevyn.them.org> <1010802194721.ZM12978@ocotillo.lan> <3B6AC5A2.7020706@cygnus.com> X-SW-Source: 2001-08/msg00066.html On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 11:39:14AM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > On Aug 2, 12:08pm, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > > > >> Fixing it "right" will be cross corefile support, but changing > >> core-regset is correct for now. If no one objects I'm going to check > >> in the below patch tomorrow, branch and trunk (when is the branch > >> release point supposed to be? Isn't it coming up on us now?). > >> > >> I tested the patch on powerpc-linux, and it works exactly as expected. > > > > > > Your patch looks good to me... (Please note that I'm not the maintainer > > of core-regset.c though.) > > > I think you two have figured out it's as ok as it can be made -> > ``obvious''. So let it be written, so let it be done (trunk and branch). -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer